Sidonie Paris


Labour immigration has traditionally been a highly contentious issue and therefore, one of the least developed areas of EU migration policy. This article explores the entrepreneurship of the European Commission over a ten-year period, which ultimately led to the adoption of the so-called ‘Blue Card Directive’ on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for economic reasons (2009/50/EC). It does so by utilising John W. Kingdon’s three stream conceptual framework, which was initially developed within the context of US politics (2014, originally published in 1984). Despite firm resistance from the part of certain member states and the unanimity voting rule regarding legal migration matters under the Amsterdam Treaty, this article demonstrates how the Commission managed to somehow navigate troubled waters. Drawing on primary European institution sources, academic works, as well as interviews with EU officials and think tank representatives, it is argued that the Commission was a key entrepreneur in the case of the Blue Card Directive, capable of genuine adaptation and tenacity. By depicting the European Commission as a supranational policy entrepreneur, which managed to anchor the subject of highly skilled immigration in the EU political agenda, the present contribution departs from works stressing the weakness of the European Commission vis-à-vis member states.


Article Keywords

European Commission, highly-skilled immigration policy, Blue Card Directive, policy entrepreneur

Research Articles
Article Copyright
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Material published in the JCER is done so under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence, with copyright remaining with the author.
  • Articles published online in the JCER cannot be published in another journal without explicit approval of the JCER editor.
  • Authors can 'self-archive' their articles in digital form on their personal homepages, funder repositories or their institutions' archives provided that they link back to the original source on the JCER website. Authors can archive pre-print, post-print or the publisher's version of their work.
  • Authors agree that submitted articles to the JCER will be submitted to various abstracting, indexing and archiving services as selected by the JCER.
Further information about archiving and copyright are contained within the JCER Open Access Policy.